I’ve read several accounts, ever aware that you can only
seek out so much information before that in itself becomes a sort of squeamish
form of voyeurism. And that’s a third rail I really don’t want to touch.
Several commentators have echoed the old saw that “there are
no winners” in a case like this. And I suppose there’s some truth to that.
After all, clichés become clichés because they contain a measure of truth. Or at least, they resonate with folks.
So I know I’m about to swim against the tide a bit. Here
goes: I think there are winners in
this case.
First, a predator is off the streets and removed from a
position he habitually used as a lure for his victims. That’s a win for every
kid he won’t molest in future.
Next, this is a major win for 10 young men who’ve been told
this week that ultimately, their personal safety and privacy is more important
than a famous man’s reputation or freedom.
We all win by reinforcing the principle that adults owe
safety and security to children. Any adult, any child, period. And adults who
step outside that principle deserve our censure.
We win when a
university president and head coach who knew or should have known what was
going on are forced out in dsgrace.
We win when we as a society display an appropriate measure
of balance. We do not grant a free pass to predators simply because they’re really
good at playing a game. Or because they’re politicians, or entertainers, for
that matter.
Personally, the one disappointment for me – other than the fact that this
happened and to so many kids for so many years – is that the criminal’s
conveyance to jail was so calm, mild even. He was handcuffed in front, wearing
his nice jacket and was courteously escorted and instructed on fastening his seat
belt.
Come on, folks! This wasn’t a disagreement among gentlemen.
It wasn’t a peccadillo. This guy is a
child molester. Those two words convey horror. This is the beast among us who
has finally been brought to heel. He
should be surrounded by shouting, spitting townsfolk carrying torches and
brandishing scythes. The air around him should be filled with shouts and
shaking fists, rotting vegetables and lumpy spittle.
He should be drug through the streets with a sign around his
neck and his hair shorn, bleeding at the knees and with fear in his eyes. But
he won’t be.
We don’t do that sort of thing, even to our most egregious
offenders. And for very good, well-settled reasons. We won’t drag him through the streets in
disgrace. We won’t lop off his wanker or throw him down a deep hole or consign
him to Coventry. As satisfying as those actions might be to some of us, we hold
ourselves to a higher standard in how we treat even the worst among us. Too bad, but necessary if we are to be who we
claim to be.
But there is some satisfaction to be had in a simple fact –
one of the worst will never again walk among us. For this at least, we’re all
winners.
Beautiful. I could not agree more. But there is still a small part of me that wants to lop off his wanker.
ReplyDelete