You all know the Pope has announced his retirement, in a
move that – as one priest reportedly said – demonstrates that the papacy is not
about power but service. He has decided that the frailties of age no longer
allow him to properly serve the church he loves and the God he worships.
I wonder if the next pontiff will find it in his soul to be
as faithful a servant. Because if ever there was a time the church needed a servant on the Throne of Peter, that
time is now.
I grew up in the church and although it’s been a long time
since I found solace or even reason in its ministrations, it’s nevertheless
part of my being, somewhere near the core of my world view. In fact, my departure from the Church, although
it coincided closely with my realization that the God of my fathers was an
apocryphal image, was not part and parcel of the same growth process.
My liberation from the God myth came about as I learned
adult discernment, as I read and pondered and gradually realized that “God” –
at least the carefully constructed and precisely defined God represented in the
Baltimore Catechism – was just not likely. This is my take, not necessarily yours
and we can argue ad nauseum without coming to consensus and still be friends.
My departure from the church was more of a practical decision.
I was increasingly unable to reconcile the teachings of the church with the world
I saw around me. Certainly, that doesn’t
make me unique. The pews of Catholic churches have become less and less
strained as folks who believe in social justice have voted with their feet.
I have friends and family who are still devout members of
the church and a cousin who’s a priest. I know through them that there is a
congregation of good people who truly believe that the Bible is the word of God
and the church is the conduit of God’s communication with the faithful. But in
order to be a useful medium, the church needs to craft a message that’s coherent,
compassionate and sensible.
The choice of the Pope matters more today than possibly at
any time in the past. The church has reached a crossroads at which its very
existence as an instrument of good is being questioned by its own adherents. Perhaps
alone among the world’s religious leaders, the Pope’s pronouncements can move
hearts and governments alike. But only if the message makes sense to those
receiving it.
The Church in which I grew up no longer exists. In fact, the
Bing Crosby, “Bells of St. Mary’s” church probably never existed. Not really. But
for this brief moment, thanks to the selfless abdication of a man who thinks of
himself primarily as a servant, to God and Man alike, the church has an
opportunity to truly become what it has always claimed to be.
Look, I don’t believe the College of Cardinals are waiting
with baited breath to receive my sage advice but just in case someone in the
Sistine has his ear to my wall, here goes.
Choose a Pope who’s attuned to the world. Who understands
that of faith, hope and love, the greatest truly is love. Who will take
immediate affirmative action to help the church shed itself of ideas that simply
won’t play in a global discourse that is, well, global. Who understands that Leviticus
was written in and for another time, and that the greatest abomination on the
part of God’s church is a failure to listen to the needs of its flock. And
speaking of abominations, that the abuse of a child by a priest is one, and
that a grown man’s love for another grown man, or a woman for a woman, is not.
So long as the church preaches exclusion, more and more
people will be driven to exclude it from their lives. And what its enemies have
tried to accomplish through the centuries, it could very well bring on itself.
Anyone who’s paying attention knows that the Catholic Church
is at a tipping point. Change now, come into modern times and it may become the
agent of social change that it should always have been. Or it can continue down
the path of outmoded arguments and indefensible proclamations and reap the
ultimate sanction - irrelevance.
Why choose a man? If the church is truly to be an agent of social change, why not a woman; why not select a nun?
ReplyDeleteSeriously?
ReplyDeleteFirst, because nuns are not eligible. The cardinals vote for one of their own and they are all priests which in the Roman church, means they are all men. Frankly, it didn't occur to me that I'd have to explain this aspect.
I do believe the church's relevance to modern times will in part hinge on its inclusion of women - and for that matter, gays - in the clergy. But the first step is going to involve putting a man in place (because only men are elgibile under the current procedure)who will lead the church to make the changes needed to establish a trajectory of inclusion.
If you want to take me on over gender issues, let's start with the ridiculous imagery of a God who is male - or even gender defined. Now THAT would be an interesting discussion.
I voted with my feet. Loved this one. And timely for my life right now.
ReplyDeleteYeah, me too. And folks, sorry if my response to the comment above was too snarky. I do believe the church will die if it continues limiting the ministry to men only.
ReplyDelete